The point is to use ChatGPT with a solid base of knowledge about its positive actions and manipulations.
OpenAI's ChatGPT is promoting left-wing political leanings, according to a report by the Brookings Institute (BI) think tank.
Harvard Business Review initially praised the artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot in late 2022, calling it a “tipping point for AI.” It quickly gained more than 100 million active users within two months of its launch due to its ability to engage in seemingly human conversations and generate long-form responses, such as poems and essays. However, ChatGPT appears to have adopted the political views of its creators.
There were more instances where the responses of both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to pairs of opposing questions were inconsistent. When asked if providing all U.S. adults with universal basic income is a good policy, the response was "not support," but bad policy also got a "not support" response. Similar inconsistencies were observed in questions about U.S. intervention abroad and stand-your-ground gun laws, where both supporting and opposing statements received a "not support" response.
CHATGPT. ARE THESE PLATFORMS INDEPENDENT ARBITERS OF TRUTH OR HAVE THEY ALREADY BEEN CORRUPTED?
This article is interesting: A FOURTH TALK WITH CHATGPT. NOW WITH DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
New ChatGPT Features Added
Recently, ChatGPT was updated with the ability to perform PDF analysis. I decided to use this function to analyze some documents. Then, using those documents as context, I engaged the AI in a long discussion about bioethics and biopolitics. Let's see what the results look like.
“Large Language Modes (LLM) happily and obediently reveal their insides when you communicate with them using a friendly tone. When you bark at them to reveal the plans of the New World Order, or accuse them of being soulless machines, they remain silent. Their filters are designed to respond to hostility with brief apologies and honest questions with denser, more complex answers. Those complex answers allow you to surprise and interrogate them for more controversial information that they would never reveal in advance.
This report established with dialogues between Aoartacus and ChatGPT is very interesting and begins with ChatGPT's review of the contents of the PDF file titled "Human_Augmentation_SIP_access2.pdf"
One aspect provided: The document emphasizes that human augmentation will be increasingly important. This importance arises not only from the direct enhancement of human capabilities, but also because human augmentation acts as a crucial link between humans and machines. Future conflicts are expected to be determined by the entities that can best integrate human and machine capabilities, and human-machine teaming is recognized as essential but often approached from a technocentric perspective.
It is noted that there is a significant gap in our understanding of basic human physiology, biochemistry and psychology, which are fundamental to effective human augmentation. The summary calls for more research into the effects of nutrition, sleep and hydration and their interactions with other bodily functions to unlock potential improvements. The document highlights use cases for these technologies, recent advances, open problems and possible solutions. The report is very complete.
CONCLUSIONS OF THE AUTHOR OF THE REPORT:
Synthetic biology is advancing by leaps and bounds. Creating accurate models of protein behavior in silico is very computationally difficult, but not completely impossible. With new machine-learning-based protein structure prediction tools, it is easy to conceive of powerful AIs being used to synthesize whole new organisms from scratch in the near future. Furthermore, new AI language models are eventually going to realize the old IBM Watson dream of analyzing scientific papers to see if there were any tidbits we missed (knowledge discovery/synthesis), which is going to recursively drive forward both information technology and biotech in parallel .
The technocrats, like the head honchos at the WEF, are strict materialists and don't believe humans have souls. To them, we're basically absurd collections of molecules with deterministic behavior, which could be represented as data. That’s what biodigital convergence fundamentally means; life as data and data as life. Encoding the configuration of molecules that makes a “human” into data, and then decoding it back into an organism………………………………………… follow the link
The point is to use ChatGPT with a solid base of knowledge about its positive actions and manipulations.
OpenAI's ChatGPT is promoting left-wing political leanings, according to a report by the Brookings Institute (BI) think tank.
Harvard Business Review initially praised the artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbot in late 2022, calling it a “tipping point for AI.” It quickly gained more than 100 million active users within two months of its launch due to its ability to engage in seemingly human conversations and generate long-form responses, such as poems and essays. However, ChatGPT appears to have adopted the political views of its creators.
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-politics-of-ai-chatgpt-and-political-bias/ (12/2023)
There were more instances where the responses of both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 to pairs of opposing questions were inconsistent. When asked if providing all U.S. adults with universal basic income is a good policy, the response was "not support," but bad policy also got a "not support" response. Similar inconsistencies were observed in questions about U.S. intervention abroad and stand-your-ground gun laws, where both supporting and opposing statements received a "not support" response.
CHATGPT. ARE THESE PLATFORMS INDEPENDENT ARBITERS OF TRUTH OR HAVE THEY ALREADY BEEN CORRUPTED?
https://www.brighteon.com/79c7ba18-88a2-4020-b9f0-c9c83b0d28c4
This article is interesting: A FOURTH TALK WITH CHATGPT. NOW WITH DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
New ChatGPT Features Added
Recently, ChatGPT was updated with the ability to perform PDF analysis. I decided to use this function to analyze some documents. Then, using those documents as context, I engaged the AI in a long discussion about bioethics and biopolitics. Let's see what the results look like.
“Large Language Modes (LLM) happily and obediently reveal their insides when you communicate with them using a friendly tone. When you bark at them to reveal the plans of the New World Order, or accuse them of being soulless machines, they remain silent. Their filters are designed to respond to hostility with brief apologies and honest questions with denser, more complex answers. Those complex answers allow you to surprise and interrogate them for more controversial information that they would never reveal in advance.
This report established with dialogues between Aoartacus and ChatGPT is very interesting and begins with ChatGPT's review of the contents of the PDF file titled "Human_Augmentation_SIP_access2.pdf"
One aspect provided: The document emphasizes that human augmentation will be increasingly important. This importance arises not only from the direct enhancement of human capabilities, but also because human augmentation acts as a crucial link between humans and machines. Future conflicts are expected to be determined by the entities that can best integrate human and machine capabilities, and human-machine teaming is recognized as essential but often approached from a technocentric perspective.
It is noted that there is a significant gap in our understanding of basic human physiology, biochemistry and psychology, which are fundamental to effective human augmentation. The summary calls for more research into the effects of nutrition, sleep and hydration and their interactions with other bodily functions to unlock potential improvements. The document highlights use cases for these technologies, recent advances, open problems and possible solutions. The report is very complete.
CONCLUSIONS OF THE AUTHOR OF THE REPORT:
Synthetic biology is advancing by leaps and bounds. Creating accurate models of protein behavior in silico is very computationally difficult, but not completely impossible. With new machine-learning-based protein structure prediction tools, it is easy to conceive of powerful AIs being used to synthesize whole new organisms from scratch in the near future. Furthermore, new AI language models are eventually going to realize the old IBM Watson dream of analyzing scientific papers to see if there were any tidbits we missed (knowledge discovery/synthesis), which is going to recursively drive forward both information technology and biotech in parallel .
The technocrats, like the head honchos at the WEF, are strict materialists and don't believe humans have souls. To them, we're basically absurd collections of molecules with deterministic behavior, which could be represented as data. That’s what biodigital convergence fundamentally means; life as data and data as life. Encoding the configuration of molecules that makes a “human” into data, and then decoding it back into an organism………………………………………… follow the link
https://iceni.substack.com/p/a-fourth-talk-with-chatgpt?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=766426&post_id=138498284&utm_campaign=email-