Diet for a Large Planet
Is it really true that by practicing vegetarianism we can help save the planet and feed the hungry? And is livestock production the evil it's painted out to be?
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Frances Moore Lappé's influential 1971 book, "Diet for a Small Planet," argues that meat production harms the environment and exacerbates global food scarcity, advocating for vegetarianism instead
Lappé highlighted that a significant portion of grain production and agricultural land is used for animal feed, contributing to hunger and malnutrition despite abundant food production
However, grazing cattle on non-tillable land can enhance soil health and support more livestock sustainably through managed grazing techniques
Animal products, particularly beef, are essential for preventing malnutrition and stunting, providing crucial nutrients like zinc, vitamins A, D, and B12
Intelligent farming practices that integrate animals and crops, which can sustain a larger, well-nourished population without corporate interference
I participated in the 2018 Long Island Food Conference, the lone meat eater in a lineup of speakers espousing “plant-based” diets. The keynote speaker was Frances Moore Lappé, whom you will recognize as the author of the very influential “Diet for a Small Planet,” the 1971 book that convinced many to embrace a diet of grains and beans.
In the book, Lappé argues that meat production has a negative environmental impact and is a major contributor to global food scarcity. By practicing vegetarianism we can help save the planet and feed the hungry, she claimed. Many answered the call. Several conference participants reported that they became vegetarians after reading her book.
(The recipes in the back of the book, and in the 1991 Twentieth Anniversary edition, updated with a long preface by Lappé, are cringe-worthy, containing margarine, skim milk, low-fat cheese, vegetable oil, eggless mayo, and lots of soy ingredients such as soy flour, tofu, soy grits, soy burgers and even unprocessed soybeans. I think Lappé gets the credit for introducing soy foods to the American public, but in her defense, no one at the time knew just how toxic they were.)
From Abundance to Scarcity: Lappé’s Contradictory Keynote on Food Production and Malnutrition
Lappé began her keynote talk at the conference by declaring that food is abundant, that the world produces twenty-nine hundred calories per day per person. But people are hungry, she says, because one-half of all grain produced goes to animal feed and three-fourths of all agricultural land is used for livestock production.
She told the audience that in spite of increased food production, many in the world suffer from malnutrition, with one in five children stunted. Two billion souls lack at least one essential nutrient. She noted, as many have, the concentration of wealth and power in the food and agricultural industries, and the influence of lobbyists.
Corn and soy — used in vegetarian and vegan foods — get subsidized, a fact that she linked with the increase of diabetes from 1% in 1970 to 10% today. GMOs came in for special criticism, which she characterized as a “Giant Missed Opportunity.” She quoted a GMO scientist who said, “We brainwashed ourselves.”
Lappé decried what she called the Scarcity Mind and the presumption of lack. Instead, she proposes the “Eco Mind,” which recognizes the fact that in biology, everything is related, that there are no parts, only participants. Whereas the Scarcity Mind leads to concentration of power in agriculture, the Eco Mind aligns with the laws of Nature.
Interestingly, Lappé did not actually say that people should be vegetarians — which one participant told me is her call to arms at most conferences — but I don’t think I have ever heard a presentation more contradictory, more brimming with mixed messages.
Managed Grazing: A Sustainable Solution for Livestock and Soil Health
Let’s start with her Scarcity Mind message that we should not eat beef (or bacon). Everyone in the audience would agree that the current feedlot system, which treats the beef cow as a receptacle for cheap, subsidized corn, is an abomination. But it’s really misleading to claim that using three-fourths of agricultural land for livestock production is a bad thing.
By some estimates, only 11% of the Earth’s surface is tillable, that is, fertile enough for crop production; but a large portion of the rest supports animal production very well. In fact, grazing cattle and other animals on this kind of land will improve the soil and make it more productive if done right — that is, with managed grazing, which in the case of beef cattle, requires no grain, and in the case of dairy cattle, requires only small amounts of grain.
And with managed grazing, you can increase the number of cattle the land will support, some say by tenfold. In an article, Joel Salatin described his conversion of a two-hundred-acre farm from continuous grazing (where the cows mill around aimlessly on a large piece of ground) to managed grazing (where the cows are confined to a small area of pasture but moved every day, in imitation of Nature’s grazing patterns).
Land that supported just thirty cows with continuous grazing, will support three hundred cows with managed grazing — and with environmental improvement rather than degradation. If the world farmed like this, then everyone could eat beef!
And that would certainly help with the main problem that Lappé mentions — that of malnutrition and stunting. Stunting is common in children who grow up on plant-based diets, mainly due to lack of zinc. And what is the best source of zinc? Why beef, of course! Only animal products can supply those nutrients most missing in Third World diets — vitamins A, D and K2, B12, B6, iron, iodine and calcium, as well as zinc.
Nature’s Blueprint: The Essential Role of Animals in Sustainable Farming
Lappé blames the increase in diabetes on subsidies for corn and soybeans, and the proliferation of GMO crops, but any diet based on grain, whether subsidized GMO or not, will predispose to diabetes, and of course, this is exactly what Lappé has been urging for the last fifty years.
The Eco Mind aligns with the laws of Nature, says Lappé, and what is the first law of Nature? It’s this: Nature never farms without animals. In every part of the world where plants grow, animals are there; and even in places where plants do not grow, such as Antarctica, animals (namely penguins) not only grow but thrive. Throughout the world, animals and plants live in symbiosis; plants support the animals, and animals help the plants, mainly by recycling them into rich manure.
If we farmed according to the laws of Nature, we would have animals on 100% of agricultural land; on land suitable for grains and produce, we’d alternate crop production with grazing to fertilize the soil; we’d have ducks and geese in our orchards to get rid of pests, and pigs in our woodlands to clear them into silvo-pastures.
Beyond Corn and Beans: The Flawed Logic of a Limited Diet for Global Hunger
But Lappé’s biggest contradiction is her premise that we live on a small planet with limited resources while claiming that at the same time that we are producing abundant food; and that because our planet is small and stressed, we need to eat an unsatisfying and limited diet so that others may eat.
How confining ourselves to a diet of corn and beans is going to help people in India and Africa have enough to eat is not explained. Of course, we could send the subsidized GMO corn that we otherwise would give to cattle to these areas, but that would only undermine local small farms, something Lappé would not condone.
The fact is, we live on a large planet, an immense planet that is fertile, abundant, plentiful, generous and gracious — especially if we farm intelligently in ways that nourish the soil instead of poison it.
It is not overpopulated — a claim brought up constantly throughout the conference — but capable of feeding many times more people than it currently does, and feeding them well, if we could just get the corporations out of the way.
Even in this age of mono-cropping and industrial farms, small farms still produce about 70% of the world’s food — and all but the poorest of these farms support animals like chickens, ducks, pigs, goats, sheep and milk cows.
Questioning the Consensus: A Divergent View on Global Warming and Dietary Choices
At our booth I spoke with a lovely young lady who asked me about the Weston A. Price Foundation’s position on global warming — since because of global warming, we need to eat a plant-based diet.
I told her that the Foundation doesn’t take a position on that subject, but that according to what I have read, the Earth stopped warming in the late 1990s and now is in a cooling trend. I talked about the Medieval Warming Period, several hundred years of weather warmer than what we currently have, when vineyards flourished in Denmark and dairy farms dotted the coast of Greenland.
Then the climate turned cold and Europe experienced the Little Ice Age, when the Thames froze over every winter and lots of people starved for lack of food.
I pointed out that these changes happened before industrialization, so man’s activities can hardly be blamed — most likely climate change has to do with variations in the sun’s activities.
In other words, we don’t have to feel guilty for driving an SUV or eating bacon, but she disagreed. Ninety-seven percent of scientists support global warming, she said, so “everybody knows” that by eating meat instead of a plant-based diet, we are contributing to melting glaciers and rising seas.
Integrating Animals Can Reduce Waste and Nourish Communities
One of the tracks at the conference focused on food waste — another reason given for eating a plant-based diet. Certainly, the current industrial food system is hugely wasteful. Tristram Stuart, a former UK pig farmer turned crusader spoke about new technologies that can turn food waste into animal feed.
He is the founder of Toast Ale, a beer made with fresh surplus bread. One is justified in asking, what kind of bread goes into this beer? Does it contain dozens of additives, GMO grain and soy flour like most bread does?
What creates the most waste in our food system is the separation of animals into single-species CAFOs. With pigs concentrated in South Carolina and dairy cows concentrated in Wisconsin, what are you going to do with the whey leftover from cheesemaking and skim milk leftover from the manufacture of butter and cream?
These are waste products that don’t nourish people but nourish pigs very well. And if pigs live on your farm, instead of in CAFOs, they can eat your kitchen garbage as well as whey and skim milk from the on-farm production of yummy, nourishing foods like cheese, butter and cream.
And if you have a brewery nearby, the pigs can get extra nutrition from spent grains. All these foods — garbage, whey, skim milk and spent grain — are free to the farmer so he doesn’t have to purchase a lot of grain. Using this system, we can all feel good about eating that ultimate product of recycled waste — bacon!
The Weston A. Price Foundation advocates supporting small, pasture-based farms by spending half your food dollar in direct sales with farmers. With the other half, you can celebrate how small the world has become.
About the Author
Sally Fallon Morell is author of the best-selling cookbook “Nourishing Traditions” and many other books on diet and health. She is the founding president of the Weston A. Price Foundation (westonaprice.org) and a founder of A Campaign for Real Milk (realmilk.com). Visit her blog at nourishingtraditions.com.
Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.
The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.
If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.
The evidence shows that the main moral and economic claims that justify the global market are very big lies that get bigger and bigger. The tirelessly proclaimed doctrine that the global market brings “more wealth for all” when, in fact, irreproachable trade evidence shows the opposite reality on the ground and around the world. because it is undeniable that the poor have lost almost half of their share of the world's wealth, while the richest have multiplied theirs at the same time. Global competition means, in fact, that the livelihoods and security of the majority continue to decline as the environment is plundered and polluted on ever greater scales of predation.
The livestock and agriculture of small producers is seriously threatened. The destruction of soils by intensive agriculture reaches the limit that intensive agricultural soils have the least carbon content. Industrial agriculture uses monocultures, synthetic overfertilization, intensive tillage, separates agriculture and livestock, causes the breakdown of agroecological cycles, uses polluting energies, the complete opposite of organic agriculture. Soil degradation is brutal for the ecosystem, about half of the chemically degraded soils are exhausted and without organic matter.
Monoculture acts against the ecological cycle of farmland. Regenerative Agriculture actively works in harmony with nature. Regenerative practices such as no-till farming, composting, cover crops, crop rotation, organic cropping, and managed grazing can help mitigate the negative impacts of monoculture.
The land must be regenerated in a symbiosis between agriculture and livestock. We cannot allow cross-pollination where pollen from new varieties can reach natural plants and modify their genetics. In addition to cross-pollination during cultivation, there are many other stages of the food chain in which contamination from transgenic organisms can occur, from grain transportation and storage to processing stages.
Industrial agriculture is degenerating agricultural land. For example, residue from Bt corn plants after turning the soil after harvest inhibits their ability to breathe (produce carbon dioxide), also reduces mycorrhizal colonization, and seriously alters bacterial populations within the soil ecosystem. This soil function is vitally important to regulate plant growth and vitality and to increase the availability of minerals and nutrients.
Agriculture together with regenerative livestock farming is a true incentive for the goal of true holistic “regenerative organic” agriculture without the consumption of chemicals, which must take a more holistic approach that also encompasses the well-being of farmers and animals, in a process to which Rodale, Steiner, Holmgren etc., pioneers of the organic regeneration movement, contributed.
What Mother Nature has done for 10,000 years in agriculture, and modification by laboratory design are not the same, is to ignore human agricultural culture, developed by millions of peasants in thousands of different biogeographic and climatic situations, that has respected natural mechanisms throughout this time, selecting new varieties of populations originated by crossing until finding and stabilizing the appropriate phenotype. These processes of adaptation and adjustment of the characteristics of crops carried out by agricultural communities over the years also permanently test their impacts on human health and the environments where new varieties are generated. Let's fight for the survival of Mother Nature.
Vegetarianism is anti-God, just like Gays and trannies, global warming, and belief in the vaccine cult.
Every major issue comes down to a battle between God's order and mans desire to be his own god. That's why Jesus said, have I not said, ye are gods? He was quoting from the old testament. The book of John confirms Jesus was with the Father from the beginning, and that all things were made by and through him.
This is where the fundamental battle lines are drawn. After Eve was tempted in the garden, and she handed the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge of good and evil to Adam, God confronted them and said, behold, ye are now one of us.
They wanted to be their own gods, deciding for themselves what was right and wrong so they could rationalize how they could do things God opposed. It's called the sin nature and we all have it. It's when we acknowledge it and bring everything back into subjection to Christ that we are set from the bond of iniquity.
So every liberal idea stems from the desire to be a god, because they don't want to submit to the one true God.