The Story of Rachel Carson: How Her Love for Nature Changed the Way Humans View the Environment
This controversial No. 1 New York Times Best Seller written by a biologist is still highly relevant today - maybe even more so than it was then.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Rachel Carson, a celebrated author and renowned environmentalist, was born in 1907 in Springdale, Pennsylvania, and raised in a home without central heat or running water
Environmental regulation only emerged following the release of Carson’s landmark book, “Silent Spring”
Carson believed that the balance of nature was a major force in the survival of man
Editor's Note: This article is a reprint. It was originally published March 4, 2017.
One of the most celebrated American writers of her time, Rachel Carson, achieved the impossible: convincing a society intent on mastering and controlling nature that we, as humans, must view ourselves as being part of nature rather than separate from it.
An impassioned writer turned biologist turned environmental activist, Carson understood from a young age her place in nature. Her mother, Marie Carson, was a former schoolteacher, who, like many women during the early 1900s gave up her career for marriage and motherhood.
Her husband Robert, Rachel's father, brought little money into the household, never providing more than a meager existence for the Carson family, who for decades lived without central heat or running water.
Though a poverty-stricken housewife, Marie was an educated woman who enjoyed reading and music and possessed an insatiable love for nature.
Fortunately for mankind, that love and respect for nature was passed down to Rachel, who today is accredited for the existence of environmental protections, and the simple willingness to weigh the impacts of technology on nature.
Inspired by a popular movement centered on the belief that children should study nature and not books, Marie transformed the great outdoors into Rachel's classroom. Together, the two spent entire afternoons outdoors identifying birds and insects while listening to and appreciating the sounds of nature.
Carson was a solitary, yet thoughtful, young girl who greeted the birds on her way to school. Her talent for writing was apparent early on as she wrote her own stories by the ripe age of 8, and by 10 had become a published author after winning a contest sponsored by the popular children's magazine, St. Nicholas. At 14, Carson was selling her work to magazines.
A Creative Writer Who Fell in Love With Science
Marie did everything in her power to ensure Rachel received the education she longed for, but never received. With the sale of her mother's china and the help of a scholarship, Carson attended the Pennsylvania College for Women.
To the shock of her friends and family, she decided to switch her major from English to Biology, eventually earning her master's degree at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland.
Carson landed a research position at a marine laboratory in Massachusetts where she discovered the ocean and her unshakable love for the vast, unexplored body of water. It was then Carson realized that everything was interconnected, and man was not in control.
Her journey into environmental activism began during World War II, a tense and fearful time in which Americans were suffering the brunt of a brutal war and infectious disease outbreaks that caused unbearable symptoms and killed millions.
While America focused on winning the war — using science to build powerful weapons and chemicals to combat disease-spreading insects — Carson accepted a position as a conservation writer with the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries, which would later become the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS).
She realized her stories would make excellent feature pieces, and began selling them to newspapers including the Baltimore Sun. Weary about losing credibility simply because she was a woman, Carson omitted her first name from her articles.
While she excelled in her job, she didn't feel satisfied and, for a while, contemplated giving up on writing. These feelings receded though, once she learned how to marry biology with writing.
Drawing Attention to the Great Blue Sea While the World Was Engulfed in War
Carson's first book, "Under the Sea-Wind," was a beautiful masterpiece that celebrated the beauty of birds and sea creatures in their natural habitat. It painted a vivid, yet mysterious picture of a never-before-seen world.
Though it received early praise, the book never hit stores and ultimately flopped as its release coincided with the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
As formidable as the war itself was the massive outbreaks of typhoid fever faced by soldiers abroad and Americans at home. Crowded and unsanitary living conditions proved to be the perfect breeding ground for body lice, which carried and spread the disease.
Typhus is a horrible condition that begins with a terrible headache and back pain, which leads to vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal rashes and eventually deafness and the loss of limbs.1 But the discovery of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) as a powerful insecticide offered hope in combating the insufferable disease, while giving man a sense of control over his environment.
Acutely toxic to insects, but seemingly harmless to humans, DDT was sprayed indiscriminately abroad and at home to kill mosquitoes carrying malaria, body lice and eventually agriculture pests. As shown in the film, millions of people were dusted with DDT. It was sprayed in their hair, inside their clothing and even on sleeping babies.
At the time, DDT seemed like a miracle, a gift from God even. DDT and the hydrogen bomb were accredited for winning the Pacific War. Swiss scientist Paul Müller won the Nobel Peace Prize for discovering DDT.
More than 4.5 million homes and 20 million acres of farmland in the southern U.S. were treated with DDT, according to the film. In 1944, Time Magazine named DDT one of the world's greatest discoveries, but Carson knew better.
Dead Birds and Fish Kills
Eventually biologists began seeing evidence that DDT was causing mass bird and fish kills. As a biologist for the FWS, Carson witnessed the evidence firsthand and wanted to write an article warning people about the possible dangers.
She pitched the idea to Reader's Digest, which promptly turned it down, telling her that housewives who used the chemical daily had no interest in learning the dangers. Carson had no choice but to shelve the idea.
Shortly thereafter, DDT became available to the public and insect-borne diseases appeared subject to man's control. The chemical was used in countless products including DDT-coated shelf paper and paints and varnishes. DDT even came in a beer can-sized cylinder that attached to a lawnmower's muffler so the hot gas would volatilize and spray across the yard. Meanwhile, Carson was focused on her second book.
Yearning to be the biographer of the ocean, she wrote "The Sea Around Us," which was published in the spring of 1951 and described the intricate beauty and eloquence of life under the sea. It was filled with news from the natural world, describing currents, waves, storm systems and the ocean's impact on climate. Carson had managed to take a complicated subject and relay it in an almost poetic way that both relaxed and intrigued readers.
Though on edge because the Soviet Union was testing the atomic bomb, Americans cherished Carson's book, which quickly made The New York Times' best sellers list. It reached the No. 1 spot, where it remained for 32 straight weeks. "The Sea Around Us" sold 2 million copies and was translated into 30 foreign languages, transforming Carson into a public figure nearly overnight.
Human Arrogance Outruns Human Wisdom
Carson's experience in government made her aware that some saw science as a way to discover new, beautiful things, while others viewed it as a way to wage war or to destroy. The development of the atomic bomb and chemicals like DDT made people feel as if they had mastered the planet. Carson, however, viewed unlimited human ingenuity as dangerous and believed that human arrogance outruns human wisdom.
As the development of weapons of mass destruction continued, Carson realized humans could in fact destroy nature. By 1956, pesticide sales had increased 25%. During that time, scientists weren't studying wildlife or environmental toxicity, but were researching pest control.
Carson's biggest concern wasn't that pesticides had unintended consequences, but that the effects were totally unknown. It soon became evident pesticide scientists were thinking only about acute toxicity and not the long-term effects.
Biologists learned that pesticides like DDT were bio-accumulating in wildlife and becoming more concentrated as they moved up the food chain. One study found that earthworms were so toxic one year after DDT exposure that they poisoned the robins feasting on them. Even more disturbing was evidence of insect resistance, which meant that birds and fish were needlessly dying while the targeted insects continued to thrive.
From Nature's Beauty to Death and Destruction
Though busy with life and unmotivated to take on pesticides, Carson realized that everything she cherished as a naturalist was being threatened, so she decided to write a book that would forever change the world. This book would differ vastly from her previous work, as it would focus on the death and destruction caused by pesticides, rather than the planet's natural beauty.
In 1959, the U.S. government finally admitted the health hazards of nuclear fallout. Carson's editor insisted that this was the perfect opening to awaken people about the dangers of pesticides. But before she could begin, a lump was discovered in Carson's breast.
Per the advice of her doctor, Carson underwent a radical mastectomy and was told that it was gone and not cancerous. But a second hard lump soon appeared, prompting her to get a second opinion from a doctor who diagnosed it as cancer. The devastating news gave Carson a newfound sense of urgency. Despite undergoing multiple rounds of painful radiation treatment, she completed her most powerful book yet — "Silent Spring" — in four years.
No Witchcraft, No Enemy — The People Had Done It Themselves
Published June 16, 1962, the book depicts an eerie image of what it would be like to awaken one morning to silence — with no birds singing and no animals rustling. A quote from the documentary "American Experience – Rachel Carson" reads:2
"In the gutter under the eaves, and between the shingles of the roofs, a few patches of white granular powder could be seen: [S]ome weeks earlier this powder had been dropped like snow upon the roofs of the lawns, the fields and the streams. No witchcraft, no enemy action had snuffed out life in this stricken world. The people had done it themselves."
The book sparked major controversy, selling 65,000 copies in less than two weeks; every newspaper in the nation reviewed it. The commotion reached the nation's capital, with President John F. Kennedy agreeing to look into the side effects of DDT.
To Solve Environmental Contamination, We Must Weigh the Costs Against the Benefits
The chemical industry quickly formed a council to discredit Carson's book. "Biased," "half-truths" and "misinformation" were some of the words used to describe it. Monsanto resorted to scare tactics, running advertisements that depicted a world overrun with infectious disease and famine.
Sadly, during the height of her success, Carson's cancer continued to spread. Yet, she still managed to share her message, appearing at Senate hearings where she warned about the potential inability to reverse man's actions. As noted in the documentary:
"We have acquired technical skills on a scale undreamed of, even a generation ago. We can do dramatic things, and we can do them quickly. By the time damaging side effects are apparent, it is often too late or impossible to reverse our actions. If we are ever to solve the basic problem of environmental contamination, we must begin to count the many hidden costs of what we're doing and to weigh them against the gains or advantages."
Carson singlehandedly managed to enact a paradigm shift in the way humans view the environment. Some say there is a before and after Rachel Carson in terms of how we think about the environment.
Carson believed that we as humans are not separate from this living world, but in fact are a part of it. April 14, 1964, Carson succumbed to cancer and died at the young age of 56. Some of her ashes were buried next to her mother's grave, while the remainder were scattered over the ocean.
The 'Silent Spring' Continues
Carson rightfully questioned the logic and sanity of using such vast amounts of a chemical without knowing much about its ecological and human health impact. Her book triggered a revolution in thinking that gave birth to the modern environmental movement, and the public outcry that resulted from her book eventually led to DDT being banned for agricultural use in the U.S. in 1972.
Unfortunately, DDT was simply replaced with other equally unsafe and untested chemicals — one of them being glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, which today is the most widely used herbicide in the world. Disturbingly, some believe glyphosate may actually be WORSE than DDT, yet the U.S. government has repeatedly failed to take affirmative action to protect us from this pervasive toxin.
Today, we're also exposed to even vaster amounts of pesticides, and a wider variety of them. Consider this: The very same companies that developed chemical warfare weapons during World War II simply transitioned into agriculture after the war, and many of the same warfare chemicals are now sprayed on our food. The notion that these chemicals are good for humans, the environment and the business of agriculture is a fabricated one.
Chemical Industry Proponents Continue Their Attacks on Carson
Carson and her work were so influential that she continues to be attacked by the chemical industry and its aggressors half a century after her death — some have even gone so far to accuse her of murder. In a 2017 article by The Daily Beast, vaccine propagandist Dr. Paul Offit wrote that Carson's "crusade against one pesticide cost millions of people their lives."3
As chief of infectious diseases and director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia — a position created with an endowment from Merck — Offit has every incentive to defend the chemical industry and attack those trying to protect future generations.
Rather than acknowledge the proven adverse health and environmental effects of DDT, Offit — who has earned millions of dollars on vaccines — claims the ban on DDT "caused tens of millions of people to die from malaria unnecessarily," most of whom were young children, he adds.
But what about the countless children maimed by DDT? Research shows that girls exposed to DDT before puberty are five times more likely to develop breast cancer.4 DDT, which is harmful even at very low levels, is also linked to male infertility, miscarriages, developmental delays, nervous system and liver damage.
Modern day research proves Carson was right about her suspicions that DDT caused health effects, yet Offit and other chemical industry proponents continue to attack a woman who displayed one of the most remarkable cases of bravery our nation has ever seen. Carson's legacy is too great to succumb to such evil attacks; however, these attacks should serve as important reminder of the dangers of people like Offit and how little they understand about "science."
Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.
The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.
If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.
Rachel Carson demonstrated her love of nature and defense of the environment and all creatures that live on earth. The relationship with nature encompasses emotions, cognitions (e.g., beliefs, attitudes, knowledge), as well as the experiences that people have in nature. The more connected people are, the more likely they are to care about and protect the environment. The relationship with nature is associated with higher levels of subjective well-being. Greater subjective well-being has been associated with good health and longevity, better social relationships, work performance, and creativity. The relationships with the health benefits of contact with nature (NR) are the most studied in relation to forests and green areas. Visiting forests is considered a method to positively influence mental, physical and social well-being. Both natural and urban forests improve people's quality of life. From a medical point of view, various plant communities have a wide range of therapeutic properties, including disinfection, blood pressure reduction, anti-asthma, immune stimulation, etc. Research findings on NR also support the biophilia hypothesis, which suggests that NR may be associated with well-being, as NR satisfies our innate need to connect with other forms of life and therefore provides comfort and fulfillment. staff. The relationship with nature is also associated with people's self-construction, since it moderates the relationship between the need to belong, the desire for social acceptance and the sense of connection. Research shows that a relationship with nature is often associated with greater happiness and greater feelings of overall purpose and meaning in life, as well as greater mindfulness. Furthermore, the relationship with nature is consistently and positively associated with greater life satisfaction and greater vitality.
Although the findings show that women seem to be more connected to nature, men may benefit more from such a connection. In general, contact with nature provides us with:------
1. Being in nature decreases stress-----
2. Nature makes you happier and less brooding---
3. Nature relieves attention fatigue and increases creativity.----
4. . Nature may help you to be kind and generous---
5. Nature makes you “feel more alive”----
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/7/1048 (2022).--
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00222216.2023.2204346 (2024).--
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3909-2 (2023).--
https://www.hackensackmeridianhealth.org/en/healthu/2022/09/02/5-reasons-going-outside-will-make-you-happier (2023).----
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-022-01760-w (2023).--
https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/tips-for-everyday-living/nature-and-mental-health/how-nature-benefits-mental-health/ .---
https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_nature_makes_you_kinder_happier_more_creative.-----
https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/our-work/research/nature-how-connecting-nature-benefits-our-mental-health .----
Pesticides and toxic substances from industrial agriculture are the main cause of chronic and degenerative diseases, including cancer. Glyphosate represents a greater danger than DDT due to its widespread application.
Studies have indicated that indoor fumigation with DDT causes high levels of human exposure. DDT is very likely to cause intergenerational harm. Toxic effects of direct exposure to DDT in humans include developmental abnormalities, reproductive diseases, neurological diseases, and cancer. Exposure to the DDT metabolite, DDE, also promotes abnormal human health effects, such as childhood diabetes and obesity. The use of DDT is unacceptable. Intergenerational effects it will cause.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2164/jandrol.106.001701 .----
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0140673601053296 .-----
https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/18/12/2525/2913531?login=false .---
https://www.med.navy.mil/Portals/62/Documents/NMFA/NMCPHC/root/Environmental%20Programs/Pages/riskcommunication/ATSDRsm.pdf .-----
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/REVEH.1999.14.1.39/html .---
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.1103862 .---
The research reports that daughters of women who had more DDT in their blood had a much higher risk of breast cancer and a higher prevalence of obesity, while sons had a higher risk of testicular cancer. Granddaughters of those women with DDT in their blood samples drawn decades ago also have a higher risk of obesity and early menstruation. These conditions are linked to cardiometabolic problems such as insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and high blood pressure, and an increased risk of breast cancer and some other cancers.
Julia Brody, executive director and senior scientist at the Silent Spring Institute, echoed Cohn's sentiments.
“This is a sign that toxic chemicals are a multigenerational problem similar to climate change,” she told Sierra. "We need increasingly comprehensive testing to eliminate the use of carcinogens and better protect public health," Ella Brody said.
https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/long-looking-health-impacts-ddt-highlighted-new-study (2021)
The microbiome is linked to many diseases, including Alzheimer's. Exposure to pesticides, as well as some metals and solvents, has been shown to have a detrimental effect on people. In fact, recent research points to the disturbing possibility that late-onset Alzheimer's disease may be caused by exposure to dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane DDT.
Researchers at Rutgers University and Emory University compared the blood of 86 people diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease with that of 79 healthy people. Both groups were similar in age and background. Their test results showed that the levels of DDE in the blood of Alzheimer's patients were approximately 3.8 times higher than those of the healthy group.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/271774