Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Guillermou's avatar

Research has revealed that 64 percent of the world's agricultural land is at risk, while 31 percent is at high risk of pesticide contamination due to widespread pesticide use. According to research published in the journal Nature Geoscience, researchers studied the use and spread of 92 pesticide active ingredients in 168 countries. The results revealed that 64 percent of the world's agricultural land was at risk of contamination by more than one pesticide active ingredient. Of that land, 31 percent was at high risk of contamination.

The study supports the call for a global strategy to transition to "sustainable agriculture and sustainable living," which involves minimal pesticide use and reduced food loss.

A recent study revealed that schools across the United States are serving genetically modified lunches containing toxins, which contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders, immune system damage, hormonal disruption, cancer, and other health conditions. 95.3 percent of which contained the carcinogenic glyphosate, and 74 percent had at least one of 29 harmful pesticides. Nine samples also contained four medications and hormones. Dr. Seneff, who has spent more than four decades as a researcher and has published more than 200 peer-reviewed scientific articles, warned that “glyphosate is far more toxic than we have been led to believe. Cancer-causing glyphosate is the most destructive chemical in our environment. One hundred percent of the school lunch samples also contained heavy metals at levels up to 6,293 times higher than the EPA’s maximum allowable levels in drinking water. Most samples were abysmally low in nutrients.

Glyphosate blocks nutrient absorption, meaning our society is literally starving itself to a slow, agonizing, premature death.

The good news is that millions of people are waking up to all this deception in the name of profit over human health. Without a doubt, it is this human awakening that is quite concerning to many people in the business and political.

https://movementdisorders.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mds.29371 (2023).---

https://www.brighteon.com/10581357-7643-4d01-87e0-7fcc48efde26 (2023).----

https://www.naturalhealth365.com/cancer-causing-glyphosate-is-the-most-destructive-chemical-in-our-environment-mit-scientist-warns.html (2023)

Expand full comment
Guillermou's avatar

Rossi's project compiled a "toxicological anthology of glyphosate" with 487 examples of evidence of its health harm. In 2020, it was updated to include more than 1,000 studies (prologue by Vanda Shiva).

https://surcosdigital.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Antologia-toxicol%C3%B3gica-del-glifosato-5-ed.pdf (2020)

GMOs do not respect natural restrictions on genetic recombination, the role of time in the genesis of diversity, and the natural mechanisms that sustain it through organic evolution. The evolutionary process, like the varieties of species, is based on sexual reproduction, the recombination of genetic material, and biological and environmental mechanisms that restrict and regulate the dynamics of the genome within each generation during evolution. Recombinant DNA biotechnology, on the other hand, has broken important restrictions on the evolutionary recombination of genetic material, although we still do not understand the nature or role of many of these restrictions, which have been established by organic evolution itself.

One of the biggest problems in today's society is that a band of undesirables does not respect the code of rules necessary to respect the ecosystem and our health, wasting money on drugs for chronic diseases that are the bane of humanity. These antisocial and dehumanizing behaviors can increase in this globalized world, led by the merchants of corrupt money, the capitalist philanthropists, who pull the strings of corrupt rulers, media outlets, and researchers. Large corporations buy friends and influence people to achieve their mafia and criminal interests. Instead of promoting the American dream based on democracy, civil rights, freedom, and equality, they give way to deception, lies, and the power of corruption. This vicious cycle is formed by lobbyists working for agribusiness and pharmaceutical companies, which promote pesticides, vaccines, and other products through the rule of fear. They suppress independent research, intimidate scientists, manipulate study designs, covertly write scientific articles to cater to their needs, and selectively publish results that serve their interests. Agencies are restricted in their effectiveness, becoming part of the "revolving door" between corporate and government employment.

A report, "Poison Merchants: How Monsanto Sold the World a Toxic Pesticide," illuminates the misinformation, science denial, and manufactured doubt at the core of the pesticide industry's public relations playbook.

Focusing on the herbicide glyphosate as a case study, the report is the first comprehensive review of Monsanto's product defense strategy, including the disinformation tactics it used to manipulate science and attack scientists and journalists who raised concerns about the health and environmental risks of its flagship product, the world's most widely used herbicide.

The report also reveals astroturf operations, as well as front groups, professors, journalists, and others that Monsanto (now owned by Bayer) relied on to protect its profits from glyphosate despite decades of science linking the toxic chemical to cancer, reproductive impacts, and other serious health concerns.

“The pesticide industry is not just following in the footsteps of Big Tobacco and Big Oil, they co-wrote the playbook — from their attacks on ‘Silent Spring’ author Rachel Carson 60 years ago to the recent Monsanto-led assault on the cancer researchers of the World Health Organization,” said Stacy Malkan, lead author of the report and co-founder of U.S. Right to Know.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/monsanto-glyphosate-roundup-poison-playbook-rtk/ (2022).----

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?